Endorsement Marketing: What Works & Why?
It’s no secret that athletes have become the standard in the brand marketing game. Almost every product has a celebrity face to it, especially when today’s world puts so much value in their support. While using an athlete as the face of a brand does not seem difficult, determining how to market athletes is where a lot of a brands fall short. When it comes to any kind of endorsements, there are three key theories that determine a campaign’s success.
1. Source Credibility
2. Source Attractiveness
3. Product Matchups
Each one of these components attempts to secure the target audience and bolster a company’s consumer recognition. In terms of source credibility, it combines a sense of expertise with trust. The athlete chosen to be the spokesperson requires some amount of sincerity and authority for the consumer to actually buy it – literally and figuratively. Audiences are not as susceptible to insincerity as once believed.
Attractiveness supports any credibility and can almost make up for a slight lacking in it. This, of course, does not mean you forgo any credibility for the allure of a professional athlete – as you will see in the failing examples below. Each of these theories works together to support the campaign, and require a delicate balance. Attractiveness acts as the likability factor -- the familiarity -- that consumers look for to make a connection with the endorser.
Finally, and most importantly, the product needs to match with the established brand of the athlete. A product should fit into the overall plan of the athlete’s marketing as an extension, not just a move for more money. Consumer reactions are all based on a connection with their heroes, and anything that does not help to create that image will fall flat.
So what are some of the worst endorsements we’ve seen? Here are three examples of marketing gone wrong:
Michael Jordan’s Slam Bowling Ball – It’s hard to knock Michael Jordan in any category as he has created one of the most recognizable brands in sports, but this venture did not go over well. His AMF basketball-styled bowling ball debuted in 1998. While he teamed up with an official bowling company, the ball was grooved, like a basketball, and did not meet regulations. Not only was it unusable, the market for the product was small. His parlay into baseball didn’t meet expectations, so why would his bowling?
Joe Montana’s Sketchers “Shape-ups” – This one just seems out of left field. A former football great endorsing ugly toning sneakers just screams it was all about the contract, not the product. Random placement will not automatically create credibility and a star endorser may not do anything for your product if not supported by the other components.
-Mia
-Mia